re:
Oprah show ***trigger warning***
message #:
11725.4 in response to 11725.3
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{HUGS}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}
I also can see why you would be upset by that.
My counselor and I just had a discussion about parts of this last week due to us discussing some family skeletons in the closet. He stated that yes the perpetrators almost always see themselves as the victim and unless they move past that, the are at a high risk of repeating. We have also had a few discussions about the survivor, namely me, feeling like they consented. Long story and definitely some triggers involved.
This is my personal observation backed up by many shooting the breeze sessions while working in a very male dominated industry so I will admit this applies mostly to female survivors. When the survivor was anywhere from infant to late teens, their was absolutely no tolerance for that from anyone I worked/work with, regardless of gender. Another absolute wrong was someone exploiting trust or power, regardless of age or age difference or gender. Incest was not accepted either. In all those cases everyone I worked/work with did/do not see the survivor as having consented. Where debates happened was when talking about the teen years close to that "legal" age of 17 or 18, depending on the state. There were some that felt 15 or 16 was old enough to give consent, despite what the law says. I want to add this, if the abuse started before that age, it was seen by everyone as just a continuation of the abuse....how does one know any different if they had always been treated that way?
I hope I don't trigger you or make things worse, but wanted to give you an answer based on my personal observations. This hasn't been a small pool of the same people either, I have worked from AK to FL and many different places in TX as well as attended several different college campuses. So I hope that on the whole you can find some comfort there.
tk