you are here: iVillage iVillage's message boards In the News  / Breaking News Stories  / 

In the News

127796 messages posted to this board
find messages about   
welcome!
 
discussion title:
 

PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Ja

emoticon:
 emoticon
message #:
  16335.1
replies:
  9
from:
  postreply  Member Icon
date:
  Nov-7 12:09 pm

In discussions on this forum, it appears many are under the impression that someone else will pay for government mandated health insurance. If the government should decide you can pay $15,000 per year for a health insurance policy, it is possible under the Pelosi bill that you can be fined up to $250,000 and sent to prison for 5 years.

According to the CBO, a conforming family health insurance policy will have a premium of $15,000 by 2016.

We all have to hope our government won't be very punitive to us, we shall now live at its mercy. If the government every decides it doesn't like our policy, or if the government ever decides we could pay but didn't, we are in jeopardy of loss of freedom. This loss of liberty is something that only seems to be of interest to conservatives.

Anyway the story is here - http://republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=153583

PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail
JCT Confirms Failure to Comply with Democrats’ Mandate Can Lead to 5 Years in Jail
Friday, November 06, 2009

Today, Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) released a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. 3962, as amended) could land people in jail. The JCT letter makes clear that Americans who do not maintain “acceptable health insurance coverage” and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years.

In response to the JCT letter, Camp said: “This is the ultimate example of the Democrats’ command-and-control style of governing – buy what we tell you or go to jail. It is outrageous and it should be stopped immediately.”

Key excerpts from the JCT letter appear below:

“H.R. 3962 provides that an individual (or a husband and wife in the case of a joint return) who does not, at any time during the taxable year, maintain acceptable health insurance coverage for himself or herself and each of his or her qualifying children is subject to an additional tax.” [page 1]

- - - - - - - - - -

“If the government determines that the taxpayer’s unpaid tax liability results from willful behavior, the following penalties could apply…” [page 2]

- - - - - - - - - -

“Criminal penalties

Prosecution is authorized under the Code for a variety of offenses. Depending on the level of the noncompliance, the following penalties could apply to an individual:

• Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.

• Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.” [page 3]

When confronted with this same issue during its consideration of a similar individual mandate tax, the Senate Finance Committee worked on a bipartisan basis to include language in its bill that shielded Americans from civil and criminal penalties. The Pelosi bill, however, contains no similar language protecting American citizens from civil and criminal tax penalties that could include a $250,000 fine and five years in jail.

“The Senate Finance Committee had the good sense to eliminate the extreme penalty of incarceration. Speaker Pelosi’s decision to leave in the jail time provision is a threat to every family who cannot afford the $15,000 premium her plan creates. Fortunately, Republicans have an alternative that will lower health insurance costs without raising taxes or cutting Medicare,” said Camp.

According to the Congressional Budget Office the lowest cost family non-group plan under the Speaker’s bill would cost $15,000 in 2016.

discussion title:
 

PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Ja

emoticon:
 emoticon
message #:
  16335.2 in response to 16335.1
replies:
  9
from:
  libraone  Member Icon
to:
  postreply  Member Icon
date:
  Nov-7 1:11 pm

If accurate the $15k is in not today's dollar value but in 7 years time. The figures are speculative. The whole scenario is base on conjecture not fact.

"We all have to hope our government won't be very punitive to us, we shall now live at its mercy."

According to your recent posts you're sitting pretty with great healthcare insurance so don't worry your head with such matters. If you're happy with your present plan you can keep it.

>"the $15,000 figure based on the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office’s estimate that the lowest non-group family plan under the Pelosi bill will be $15,000 per year by the year 2016.  The Pelosi bill is expected to be voted on this weekend, outside of the normal media cycle.  As of this reporting, media outlets are stating that Ms. Pelosi may not have the votes needed to pass the bill in its current form."<

Segment from....

http://yesbuthowever.com/pelosi-bill-jail-health-insurance-8136225/comment-page-1/

Photobucket      The WeatherPixie Patriot
discussion title:
 

PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Ja

emoticon:
 emoticon
message #:
  16335.3 in response to 16335.1
replies:
  9
from:
to:
  postreply  Member Icon
date:
  Nov-7 2:43 pm

**In discussions on this forum, it appears many are under the impression that someone else will pay for government mandated health insurance. **

I haven't gotten this impression at all. I'm pretty clear that everyone here  understands, they are paying already, but not necessarily benefitting. In some cases, people aren't even afforded the opportunity to buy in, though they pay taxes, that support other people, recieving health benefits and support the corporate welfare insurance companies recieve.

***According to the Congressional Budget Office the lowest cost family non-group plan under the Speaker’s bill would cost $15,000 in 2016.
****

Hey, this looks like a bargain to me. For a WHOLE FAMILY!!!!!! In 7 YEARS!!!! My partners coverage ALONE, through the state high risk pool, SUBSIDIZED by the state (aka CORPORATE WELFARE) $12K a year quote in 2008. Cheaper to not get married and have him get "free" health care through the state.

Yippe Yahoo Hurray!!!!!!!! Looks like MAYBE we'll be able to finally get married in the near future. (Maybe in 7 years!!!!!!!!! When our kid is 13!!!!!!!!!)

>
discussion title:
 

PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Ja

emoticon:
 emoticon
message #:
  16335.4 in response to 16335.3
replies:
  9
from:
  postreply  Member Icon
to:
date:
  Nov-7 3:14 pm

"I haven't gotten this impression at all. I'm pretty clear that everyone here understands, they are paying already, but not necessarily benefitting. In some cases, people aren't even afforded the opportunity to buy in, though they pay taxes, that support other people, recieving health benefits and support the corporate welfare insurance companies recieve."

Most of the posts I've seen here involve stories about people who can't afford the various premiums for their health insurance. I have not seen a post about anyone who says Boy I'm so grateful to BO. Soon I'll be able to pay $300 plus (or more) every month to have health insurance.

discussion title:
 

PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Ja

emoticon:
 emoticon
message #:
  16335.5 in response to 16335.3
replies:
  9
from:
  postreply  Member Icon
to:
date:
  Nov-7 3:25 pm

"Hey, this looks like a bargain to me. For a WHOLE FAMILY!!!!!! In 7 YEARS!!!! My partners coverage ALONE, through the state high risk pool, SUBSIDIZED by the state (aka CORPORATE WELFARE) $12K a year quote in 2008. Cheaper to not get married and have him get "free" health care through the state."

Suggest you re-read the post .... it said the lowest cost plan would be $15,000. No telling what won't be covered under the lowest cost plan, then the complaining will commence when this and that isn't covered.

Change the number of messages
displayed on this page in
Indicate your interest in the discussion
   
Get updates to this discussion
delivered by email