discussion title:
Mom trying to avoid repeat c-section
message #:
7644.2 in response to 7644.1
" After their discussion with their doctor, the Szabos made an appointment to speak with Page Hospital's CEO, Sandy Haryasz. When the couple told her about their desire for a vaginal birth, they say Haryasz would not budge, even telling them she would get a court order if necessary to ensure Joy delivered via C-section.
"I was a bit flabbergasted, because that seemed rather extreme," Joy says. "I'd already had a VBAC at Page and it went fine. And if something happened, I know they can do an emergency C-section, because they did one for Michael."
Well, I think that pretty much sums it up. If other Drs/hospitals are willing to do a VBAC and it's not like a c-section is considered to be a life-saving treatment for mom or baby, then the dr is wrong and parents are right. They want to do a c-section just because they no longer do VBACs. So to have a court order to force her into a c-section is absolutely wrong. You can't force someone to have an abortion or force them to NOT have an abortion so why can you force someone to have a surgical delivery...for no good reason other then that hospital doesn't do VBACs? Absolutely criminal, in my opinion.
Terribly sad that she has to go so far away, though.
Sarah