discussion title:
"Good" parent circumstantial?
message #:
9184.3 in response to 9184.1
<perhaps someone is a good CP but not NCP >
I don't think CP/NCP status, by itself, has anything to do with being a good or bad parent.
<maybe a person did not make good parenting choices in their early twenties but then went on to have a child in their forties and was a different parent>
Yes. I believe that often happens.
<Do you think that a parent who you would think was a very good parent in an intact family has the capability of being a "bad" parent after a divorce? >
Yes. I believe that also often happens. I also think that some people who were bad parents during the marriage turn out to be rather decent parents after divorce.
<And can a parent be a "good parent" to one child and a "bad parent" to another?>
Absolutely.
I think that the issue really isn't is a person "good" or is a person "bad", unless the person is a saint (good to everyone) or demonic (evil to everyone). The issue, is the person good to me or not good to me. Or in this case, is the person good to my child or not good to my child.
I think each child has a right to say they could care less if their parent was good to someone else. It's insignificant. As a matter of fact, it's worse than insignificant. It's generally far more biting if you know a parent CAN be good to someone, as exhibited by the parent's behavior to someone else, but just did not chose to be good to you.